≡ Menu

Comparing the three LEGO Hulkbuster versions

LEGO recently released two new versions of the Hulkbuster in the #76014 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Hulkbuster Smash-Up and the #76105 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes The Hulkbuster: Ultron Edition. In addition, LEGO also released a Hulkbuster back in 2015 in the #76031 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes The Hulk Buster Smash. With three brick-built Hulkbusters in the LEGO Super Heroes line, this would be a good time to compare them. 🙂

According to the Iron Man Wiki, “The The Mark 44 (XLIV), also known as the “Hulkbuster”, is an Extra Heavy-Duty Modular Armor created by Tony Stark and Bruce Banner as a security safeguard in the event of an uncontrollable Hulk rampage. The armor works by attaching itself around the base armor of the Mark 43. The Mark 44 is eleven feet high, which makes it the tallest armor to date. Its height is 3 feet taller than the Hulk. Aside from its height, it is also the heaviest armor existing in the MCU. The Hulkbuster is a Modular Armor wherein armor pieces are attached to a base armor making it much bigger.” In other words, the Hulkbuster is big, chunky, and powerful, but also very agile and dynamic with parts and weapons that can be changed out on the fly. So, let’s take a look at how LEGO designers translated the Hulkbuster into LEGO form.

The #76031 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes The Hulk Buster Smash includes the smallest of the three Hulkbusters. Compared to the later releases, it looks simple and plain, but it does have very good articulation. This is achieved by using LEGO Technic pieces and large LEGO Constraction Figure pieces (introduced in the LEGO Bionicle line) for the mech’s skeleton. The bulk of the mech is then built up using standard LEGO elements. The result is a sturdy mech with great flexibility ready for dynamic poses and lots of play. The head, shoulders, chest, and arms are fairly accurate to the real Hulkbuster, and the legs are also pretty well done. Where the shaping of the model lacks is at the hips; the joints are exposed, and the transition between the torso and legs is crude. This gives the Hulkbuster more of a robot-like appearance, rather than an armored suit.

The #76014 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Hulkbuster Smash-Up is a second attempt at making a Hulkbuster for a LEGO playset. It is about the same size as the first Hulkbuster, but with more rounded shapes, taking advantage of a number of recently introduced pieces. This solves some of the problems of the previous Hulkbuster looking too square and robot-like. The attachment of the legs to the torso is also done better, although it is still far from being accurate. The arms and legs are fully articulated and work very well. From the two playset versions of the Hulkbuster, the newer one is a nicely done upgrade. The only thing I don’t like so much is the feet. I feel like in the earlier set the shaping of the feet was done better, although I do appreciate the articulated toes on the new one.

The #76105 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes The Hulkbuster: Ultron Edition is a much larger and pricier model, primarily aimed at collectors who are looking for accuracy and display-value rather than playability. As you can see, this is a big Hulkbuster; more than twice as tall as the two playset versions. This means that LEGO designers could put in a lot more detail. You can see that each body part is shaped more carefully to look good from different angles, and the entire model looks great from all sides. LEGO designers did a particularly excellent job with the shaping of the feet, the lower legs, and the upper legs. The transition from the legs to the torso is also done much better than on the smaller models. However, there is something wrong with the shaping of the torso – especially the shoulders. The whole upper part of the body appears to be out of proportion compared to the legs. Also, the head seems to be too big. I think bulking up the shoulders would significantly improve the look of this model, although that may also limit the posability.

Speaking of posability, the arms and fingers have a good range of motion, and the waist can also turn. However, the legs are not posable at all, besides some basic back and forth movement at the hips. This is quite strange for such large and detailed models that suppose to replicate an agile mech. I understand that LEGO designers had to focus on making the model stable to make sure it doesn’t fall over or collapse on itself, but at least some limited movement at the knees and ankles should have been achievable.

The Ultron Edition Hulkbuster includes two interchangeable left arms; a regular one, and a jackhammer arm with punching function. This feature of the set is really well done. Another nice feature is the light-brick in the chest, although it would have been great if it actually glows blue instead of yellow. The glow-in-the-dark pieces are a nice touch as well.

In summary, I would say that each of the three sets has plusses and minuses, and surprisingly, the largest set is not necessarily the best in every way. Both of the small sets are sturdy with great playability and articulation, with the newer set looking better overall. The Ultron Edition Hulkbuster has some nice details, but it lacks posability, and the upper body needs rework. None of the three sets replicate the look of the real Hulkbuster faithfully, although they each have some sections that are very well done.

Above is a very helpful comparison picture of the three versions of the Hulkbuster by LEGO fan Mookiewook, so you can see them side by side. And below, I have included video-reviews of all three sets by JANGBRiCKS, so you can see them in more detail.

I’m looking forward seeing how LEGO fans improve on the designs, and perhaps combine some of the best features of each set to create the ultimate Hulkbuster. I have already seen one great solution to the unsightly legs to torso connection for the two smaller Hulkbusters by LEGO fan Gzu Bricks. He angled the legs instead of having them straight, which results in a much more natural look. You can see more pictures and details in his flickr gallery (just click on his name to get there).

To fix the shoulders of the Ultron Edition Hulkbuster, LEGO fan CX52J created more rounded brick-built pauldrons that improve the look of the model greatly. He also provided LEGO Digital Designer files and instructions (just click on his name to get them).

If I would have to choose one Hulkbuster, I would recommend the one in the #76014 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes Hulkbuster Smash-Up. In some ways, it looks closest to the real Hulkbuster, and it also has great playability. However, if you want to spend time improving and customizing the Hulkbuster, the #76105 LEGO Marvel Super Heroes The Hulkbuster: Ultron Edition may be a better option simply because of the number of parts you get in the right colors. You can find both sets at the LEGO Marvel Super Heroes section of the Online LEGO Shop.

What do you think? Which LEGO version of the Hulkbuster do you like the most? Feel free to share your thoughts and own reviews in the comment section below! 😉

And you might also like to check out the following related posts:

{ 12 comments }

LEGO plants from plants – sustainable LEGO

A few days ago, LEGO announced in a press-release, that their botanical elements – such as leaves, bushes and trees – will be made from plant-based plastic sourced from sugarcane. The new pieces will appear in LEGO boxes as early as this year. The move is part of the LEGO Group’s commitment to use sustainable materials in core products and packaging by 2030. Below are the details. 🙂

Production has started on a range of sustainable LEGO elements made from plant-based plastic sourced from sugarcane. The new sustainable LEGO ‘botanical’ elements will come in varieties including leaves, bushes and trees.

“At the LEGO Group we want to make a positive impact on the world around us, and are working hard to make great play products for children using sustainable materials. We are proud that the first LEGO elements made from sustainably sourced plastic are in production and will be in LEGO boxes this year. This is a great first step in our ambitious commitment of making all LEGO bricks using sustainable materials,” said Tim Brooks, Vice President, Environmental Responsibility at the LEGO Group.

The new sustainable LEGO elements are made from polyethylene, which is a soft, durable and flexible plastic, and while they are based on sugar-cane material, they are technically identical to those produced using conventional plastic. The elements have been tested to ensure the plant-based plastic meets the high standards for quality and safety that the LEGO Group has, and consumers expect from LEGO products.

“LEGO products have always been about providing high quality play experiences giving every child the chance to shape their own world through inventive play. Children and parents will not notice any difference in the quality or appearance of the new elements, because plant-based polyethylene has the same properties as conventional polyethylene,” said Tim Brooks.

The unique LEGO brick design, and the LEGO Group’s uncompromised focus on quality and safety during the past 60 years ensures that two LEGO bricks produced decades apart can still fit together. As the LEGO Group is working towards using sustainable materials in its core products and packaging, it will remain strongly rooted and driven by the uncompromised focus on high product quality and safety.

The LEGO Group has partnered with WWF to support and build demand for sustainably sourced plastic, and has joined the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance (BFA), an initiative of WWF, to secure fully sustainable sourcing of raw material for the bioplastics industry. The plant-based plastic used to make the botanical LEGO elements is certified by the Bonsucro Chain of Custody standard for responsibly sourced sugarcane.

“It is essential that companies in each industry find ways to responsibly source their product materials and help ensure a future where people, nature, and the economy thrive,” said Alix Grabowski, a senior program officer at WWF. “The LEGO Group’s decision to pursue sustainably sourced bio-based plastics represents an incredible opportunity to reduce dependence on finite resources, and their work with the Bioplastic Feedstock Alliance will allow them to connect with other companies to continue to think creatively about sustainability.”

It is also interesting to note from the press-release that currently there is no common definition of what a sustainable material is, but there are several aspects that influence what material is considered sustainable. To a high degree, it is determined by the material’s source, chemical composition, its use (in a product) and management (at end-of-life), and the impact it can have in both environmental and social areas. The LEGO Group believes a new sustainable material must have an ever-lighter footprint than the material it replaces across key environmental and social impact areas such as fossil resource use, human rights and climate change.

LEGO has been making significant efforts to be as eco-friendly as possible. Through investments in wind power, the energy used to make LEGO bricks is balanced by the production of renewable energy. They also regularly tweak their packaging to be more eco-friendly; like introducing sustainable paper pulp trays for the LEGO advent calendars, reducing plastic waste from going to landfill. And they targeted 2030 to reach zero waste in operations.

I’m very curious to try out the new sugarcane plants! Are they going to be sweet? Just kidding… The press-release indicates that we shouldn’t notice any difference, but still, I want to put that to the test. Durability and longevity are very important considerations when it comes to LEGO pieces. They have to be able to survive the rough play of children, and the erosive power of natural elements and time. I’m also wondering what other elements LEGO is going to be working on next! Makes me both nervous and excited for the future of LEGO bricks!

What do you think? How do you like the sugarcane plants and the idea of making LEGO bricks more sustainable? Do you have any comments, questions, concerns about the process? Feel free to share your thoughts and discuss in the comment section below! 😉

And you might also like to check out the following related posts:

{ 13 comments }